Skip to main content

The Myth of Adam Smith's Invisible Hand. [LLM Assisted]

Adam Smith famously mentioned the “invisible hand” only three times across all of his published works.

Here is the breakdown:

  1. In The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) – He uses it to describe how the rich, in pursuing luxury, unintentionally distribute necessities to the poor: “They are led by an invisible hand to make nearly the same distribution of the necessaries of life…”
  2. In An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776) – This is the most famous reference, where he describes how individuals pursuing self-interest in free markets often benefit society more than if they intended to: “He intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.”
  3. In Essays on Philosophical Subjects (published posthumously, 1795) – In his “History of Astronomy,” he uses the phrase metaphorically to describe how ancient polytheists attributed irregular events like storms to invisible gods (the “invisible hand of Jupiter”).

Important Context:

· Not a central theory: Despite its later iconic status in economics, the term was a minor metaphor for Smith. He never rigorously defined it as a formal concept. · Modern interpretation: The phrase was elevated in the 20th century to symbolize the self-regulating nature of free markets—an interpretation that goes beyond Smith’s original usage. · Smith’s broader thought: His work emphasized moral philosophy, sympathy (Theory of Moral Sentiments), and institutional frameworks for markets, not just “invisible hand” mechanisms.

So, while the “invisible hand” is famously associated with Adam Smith, he only used the phrase three times, and never as the cornerstone of his economic thinking it later became.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Segunda Ronda de Pensamientos Económicos Asistidos por Máquina de Modelo de Lenguaje (LLM).

Economic Theory Analysis Determining the "most mathematically complex economics theory" Is subjective, as complexity depends on the mathematical tools required and the depth of abstraction. However, several contenders stand out for their reliance on advanced mathematics. Here's a breakdown: 1. General Equilibrium Theory (Arrow-Debreu Model) Mathematical Tools : Con Determining the "most mathematically complex economics theory" is subjective, as complexity depends on the mathematical tools required and the depth of abstraction. However, several contenders stand out for their reliance on advanced mathematics. Here's a breakdown: --- ### **1. General Equilibrium Theory (Arrow-Debreu Model)** **Mathematical Tools**: - Convex analysis, topology, fixed-point theorems (Brouwer/Kakutani). - Measure theory, differential topology. **Complexity**: Proves the existence of competitive equilibria in multi-market e...
Post a Comment
Read more

Adam Smith Contradictions.

Adam Smith Contradiction Analysis. Adam Smith's foundational axioms in classical economics, while groundbreaking, contain several logical contradictions that have been critiqued and debated over time. Here's a structured analysis of these contradictions: 1. Self-Interest vs. Societal Benefit Axiom : Smith posits that individuals pursuing self-interest in free markets unintentionally promote societal welfare via the "invisible hand." Contradiction : This assumes markets are self-regulating and efficient. However, modern economics identifies market failures (e.g., externalities, public goods, information asymmetry) where self-interest leads to suboptimal outcomes (e.g., pollution, monopolies). Smith acknowledged limited government roles (e.g., enforcing contracts), but his framework underestimates systemic risks of unregulated greed, such as exploitation or inequality. 2. Theory of Value Inconsistencies Axiom : Smith's labor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Contradictions in Von Hayek, which inspired Vargas Llosa's economical thought. — LLM Assisted.

  Friedrich Hayek's economic theories, while influential, contain several potential logical contradictions when examined through the lens of their internal consistency. Here's a structured analysis of these contradictions: 1.  Knowledge Problem vs. Market Efficiency Axiom : Hayek posits that markets efficiently aggregate dispersed, tacit knowledge through price signals, surpassing centralized planning. Contradiction : If individuals possess inherently limited and localized knowledge, the price mechanism may still fail to fully capture complex information, leading to inefficiencies (e.g., asset bubbles). This challenges the assumption of market efficiency, suggesting a gap between theoretical aggregation and practical implementation. 2.  Spontaneous Order vs. Deliberate Regulation Axiom : Institutions evolve organically ("spontaneous order") without central design, ensuring adaptability. Contradiction : Addressing externalities (e.g., pollution) often requires delibera...
Post a Comment
Read more