Skip to main content

LLM generated Marx theories in formulas.

Marxist Theory Formalization

Marxist Theory Formalization

Primitive Sets and Functions

π’œ: Set of all agents (individuals)
π’ž: Set of all social classes
β„³: Set of all modes of production
β„›: Set of all economic resources
𝒯: Ordered set of time periods, 𝒯 ⊂ β„€⁺
m(t) ∈ β„³: Mode of production at time t
Class(a, c, t): Agent a ∈ π’œ belongs to class c ∈ π’ž at time t
Owns(c, r, t): Class c ∈ π’ž owns resource r ∈ β„› at time t

Economic Base and Superstructure

B(t): Economic base at time t
B(t) = (m(t), OWNERSHIP(t))
S(t): Superstructure at time t
S(t) = f(B(t))

Class Definitions

Bourgeoisie(c, t) := (m(t) = Capitalism) ∧ (∀r ∈ β„›mp, Owns(c, r, t))

Proletariat(c, t) := (m(t) = Capitalism) ∧ (∀a ∈ π’œ, Class(a, c, t) ⇒ ¬∃r ∈ β„›mp, Owns(a, r, t))

Labor Theory of Value and Exploitation

L(r, t) ∈ ℝ⁺: Socially necessary labor time
V(r, t) ∈ ℝ⁺: Value of resource r at time t
V(r, t) = L(r, t)

W(a, t) ∈ ℝ⁺: Wage paid to worker a
Lcreated(a, t) ∈ ℝ⁺: Value created by worker a
s(a, t) = Lcreated(a, t) - W(a, t)
St = ∑a ∈ π’œw s(a, t)

Capitalist Accumulation and Immiseration

K(c, t) ∈ ℝ⁺: Capital owned by class c at time t
∀t′ > t, K(cb, t′) > K(cb, t)

∀t′ > t, ∑a ∈ π’œcp W(a, t′) ≤ ∑a ∈ π’œcp W(a, t)

Class Consciousness and Revolution

CC(c, t) ∈ {0, 1}: Class consciousness
CC(cp, t) = F(B(t), St)

Crisis(t) ∈ {0, 1}: Economic crisis at time t
Rev(t) := (m(t) = Capitalism) ∧ CC(cp, t) = 1 ∧ Crisis(t) = 1

Rev(t) ⇒ (m(t+1) = Socialism) ∧ (S(t+1) = f(B(t+1))) ∧ (B(t+1) ⇒ cp)

(m(t) = Socialism) ∧ (ClassAntagonism(t) ≈ 0) ⇒ ∃Ξ”t > 0, m(t+Ξ”t) = Communism

Mathematical Proof of Logical Consistency

1. Capitalist Accumulation: limt→∞ K(cb, t) = ∞
2. Immiseration: limt→∞ St = ∞
3. Class Consciousness: ∃t1 ∈ 𝒯, ∀t ≥ t1, CC(cp, t) = 1
4. Economic Crises: ∃t2 ≥ t1, Crisis(t2) = 1
5. Revolution: Rev(t2) = 1
6. Transition to Socialism: m(t2 + 1) = Socialism
7. Transition to Communism: ∃t3 > t2 + 1, ClassAntagonism(t3) ≈ 0 ⇒ m(t3) = Communism
Note: This is a proof of logical consistency within the Marxist framework, not empirical verification.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Segunda Ronda de Pensamientos EconΓ³micos Asistidos por MΓ‘quina de Modelo de Lenguaje (LLM).

Economic Theory Analysis Determining the "most mathematically complex economics theory" Is subjective, as complexity depends on the mathematical tools required and the depth of abstraction. However, several contenders stand out for their reliance on advanced mathematics. Here's a breakdown: 1. General Equilibrium Theory (Arrow-Debreu Model) Mathematical Tools : Con Determining the "most mathematically complex economics theory" is subjective, as complexity depends on the mathematical tools required and the depth of abstraction. However, several contenders stand out for their reliance on advanced mathematics. Here's a breakdown: --- ### **1. General Equilibrium Theory (Arrow-Debreu Model)** **Mathematical Tools**: - Convex analysis, topology, fixed-point theorems (Brouwer/Kakutani). - Measure theory, differential topology. **Complexity**: Proves the existence of competitive equilibria in multi-market e...

Adam Smith Contradictions.

Adam Smith Contradiction Analysis. Adam Smith's foundational axioms in classical economics, while groundbreaking, contain several logical contradictions that have been critiqued and debated over time. Here's a structured analysis of these contradictions: 1. Self-Interest vs. Societal Benefit Axiom : Smith posits that individuals pursuing self-interest in free markets unintentionally promote societal welfare via the "invisible hand." Contradiction : This assumes markets are self-regulating and efficient. However, modern economics identifies market failures (e.g., externalities, public goods, information asymmetry) where self-interest leads to suboptimal outcomes (e.g., pollution, monopolies). Smith acknowledged limited government roles (e.g., enforcing contracts), but his framework underestimates systemic risks of unregulated greed, such as exploitation or inequality. 2. Theory of Value Inconsistencies Axiom : Smith's labor...

Contradictions in Von Hayek, which inspired Vargas Llosa's economical thought. — LLM Assisted.

  Friedrich Hayek's economic theories, while influential, contain several potential logical contradictions when examined through the lens of their internal consistency. Here's a structured analysis of these contradictions: 1.  Knowledge Problem vs. Market Efficiency Axiom : Hayek posits that markets efficiently aggregate dispersed, tacit knowledge through price signals, surpassing centralized planning. Contradiction : If individuals possess inherently limited and localized knowledge, the price mechanism may still fail to fully capture complex information, leading to inefficiencies (e.g., asset bubbles). This challenges the assumption of market efficiency, suggesting a gap between theoretical aggregation and practical implementation. 2.  Spontaneous Order vs. Deliberate Regulation Axiom : Institutions evolve organically ("spontaneous order") without central design, ensuring adaptability. Contradiction : Addressing externalities (e.g., pollution) often requires delibera...